The Deductibility of R&M on Recently Acquired Assets: New Zealand Tax Guidance

Introduction

New Zealand’s Inland Revenue has recently clarified a complex area of tax law through the release of draft guidance addressing the deductibility R&M on Recently Acquired Assets. This guidance, published as “Question We’ve Been Asked” (QWBA) PUB000459, introduces important concepts that will impact how businesses approach repair costs following asset acquisitions.

Background and Context

While businesses have long relied on Interpretation Statement 12/03 for general guidance on repairs and maintenance deductions, questions persisted regarding expenditure on repairs to recently acquired capital assets. The new QWBA addresses this specific issue, providing clarity on when such expenditure can be claimed as a deduction versus when it must be treated as capital expenditure.

The Core Principle: R&M on Recently Acquired Assets

Definition and Concept

The QWBA introduces the concept of “initial repairs” – a term that describes work carried out on recently acquired capital assets where the expenditure is considered non-deductible capital expenditure. These initial repairs involve work necessary to ensure that a capital asset is suitable for its intended use within a taxpayer’s business.

Crucially, these repairs are non-deductible even if the same repair work, if incurred by the previous owner before sale, would have been deductible for that previous owner. This represents a significant shift in thinking about the nature of repair expenditure based on timing and ownership context.

Legal Framework

The capital limitation rule in section DA 2(1) of the Income Tax Act 2007 prevents businesses from claiming deductions for initial repairs because the expenses are considered capital in nature. However, if the capital asset constitutes depreciable property, businesses may add the expenditure to the asset’s cost for depreciation purposes.

Practical Application: The MetroHub Example

The QWBA includes a comprehensive example involving MetroHub Properties Ltd, which acquired a commercial complex comprising several buildings. While most buildings were tenanted and income-producing, one multi-storey building had been unoccupied for years and was in run-down condition.

MetroHub incurred expenditure in the acquisition year to repair this building, including:

• Interior cleaning and rubbish removal
• Redecorating
• Roof, guttering, and downpipe repairs
• Replacing broken windows
• Maintaining exterior grounds

These repairs were classified as initial repairs because they were required to restore the building’s functionality to enable MetroHub’s intended use for leasing purposes. This classification applied despite other parts of the complex already functioning as intended.

Importantly, the expenditure would be added to the asset’s cost, subject to the applicable depreciation rate. Given that commercial buildings have carried a 0% depreciation rate since 1 April 2024, identifying the relevant asset being worked on becomes crucial for residential versus commercial property distinctions.

Key Distinctions and Exceptions

Normal Wear and Tear

The QWBA clarifies that initial repairs do not include work remedying normal wear and tear arising from a taxpayer’s use of an asset in business operations. For instance, if a building had been tenanted and a window broke, expenditure to replace that window would likely qualify as deductible repairs and maintenance, even if undertaken shortly after acquisition.

The key distinction lies in whether costs are necessary to restore asset functionality so it can form part of the taxpayer’s income-earning business structure. In the window example, the building was already part of the income-earning activity, making routine repairs deductible.

Apportionment Possibilities

The guidance acknowledges that expenditure can be apportioned between initial repairs and repairs for normal wear and tear. However, if the normal wear and tear element is “simply ancillary” to an initial repair, the entire amount is treated as capital expenditure.

The QWBA does not define “simply ancillary,” requiring case-by-case analysis based on specific facts and circumstances.

The “Recently Acquired” Timeframe

Lack of Specific Criteria

Notably, Inland Revenue has not provided specific guidance on what constitutes a “recently acquired” asset. The QWBA only states that the shorter the time between purchase and repairs, the stronger the inference that repairs were needed to restore functionality for intended business use.

This deliberate ambiguity appears designed to prevent taxpayers from simply waiting out a predetermined period before claiming repair deductions.

Factors for Consideration

The QWBA emphasizes that all facts and circumstances must be considered, including:

Asset Condition Factors:

• State of repair or disrepair at acquisition
• Whether the asset was fit for intended business use
• Asset price or value at acquisition and whether this reflected the state of repair

Use and Timing Factors:

• Previous asset use compared to intended business use
• Nature and extent of repair work
• Timing of the work
• Whether any business use occurred before or during repairs

Price Considerations:
The purchase price of secondhand assets typically reflects various factors, including state of disrepair. This price becomes relevant for initial repair determinations to the extent it indicates asset condition at acquisition time.

Strategic Implications for Businesses

Tax Planning Considerations

The guidance creates several important considerations for tax planning:

1. Acquisition Due Diligence: Businesses should carefully document asset conditions at acquisition to support future repair deductibility claims.
2. Timing Strategies: While no specific timeframe is provided, businesses should be aware that immediate post-acquisition repairs face heightened scrutiny.
3. Asset Identification: With commercial buildings subject to 0% depreciation rates, proper identification of the relevant asset being repaired becomes crucial.
4. Documentation Requirements: Comprehensive documentation of repair necessity, timing, and business use will be essential for supporting deductibility claims.

Compliance and Risk Management

The guidance reinforces the importance of:

• Detailed record-keeping regarding asset conditions and repair timing
• Professional advice on complex repair/capital expenditure distinctions
• Understanding the interaction between repair deductibility and depreciation rules
• Consideration of apportionment possibilities where mixed repair types exist

Comparison with Previous Ownership

An interesting aspect of the guidance is its recognition that the same expenditure could have different tax treatment depending on ownership context. Repairs that would be deductible for a long-term owner may be capital for a recent acquirer, highlighting the importance of timing and business context in tax determinations.

Using the MetroHub example, if the same costs were incurred by a previous owner who had held the building for 20 years, expenditure such as interior cleaning and window replacement would likely be deductible repairs and maintenance, given the absence of “recent acquisition” circumstances.

Broader Policy Implications

The guidance reflects broader tax policy principles regarding the capital/revenue distinction. By focusing on the functionality restoration aspect of repairs on recently acquired assets, Inland Revenue is emphasizing substance over form in tax determinations.

This approach aligns with international tax principles that distinguish between expenditure that creates or enhances income-earning capacity (capital) versus expenditure that maintains existing capacity (revenue).

Practical Recommendations when dealing with R&M on Recently Acquired Assets

For Businesses

1. Pre-Acquisition Planning: Factor potential repair costs into acquisition pricing and tax planning
2. Documentation Strategy: Maintain detailed records of asset conditions and repair timing
3. Professional Advice: Consult tax advisers before undertaking significant repairs on recently acquired assets
4. Apportionment Analysis: Consider whether repair expenditure can be legitimately apportioned between capital and revenue components

For Advisers

1. Client Education: Ensure clients understand the initial repairs concept before asset acquisitions
2. Due Diligence Support: Assist in documenting asset conditions and repair requirements
3. Ongoing Compliance: Monitor repair expenditure timing and nature for appropriate tax treatment
4. Risk Assessment: Evaluate the strength of deductibility positions based on the guidance factors

Conclusion

The new QWBA guidance on repairs to recently acquired assets provides much-needed clarity while introducing additional complexity through the “initial repairs” concept. While the guidance confirms that immediate post-acquisition repairs are generally capital in nature, it also provides a framework for analyzing when repairs might qualify for deductibility.

The deliberately flexible approach to defining “recently acquired” assets requires careful case-by-case analysis, making professional advice essential for navigating this area. Businesses must balance the immediate tax benefits of repair deductions against the risk of challenge based on the guidance principles.

Ultimately, this guidance reinforces the fundamental importance of the capital/revenue distinction in tax law while providing practical guidance for one of its most challenging applications. As businesses adapt to these clarifications, careful planning and documentation will be key to achieving optimal tax outcomes while maintaining compliance with New Zealand tax law.

The guidance serves as a reminder that tax outcomes often depend not just on what expenditure is incurred, but when and in what context it occurs. For businesses acquiring assets requiring repair, this timing element now carries additional significance in determining the ultimate tax treatment of necessary expenditure.

Learn more: What expenses are tax-deductible in NZ?

Ready to Work With Us?

If you’re looking for Accountants in Auckland who can advise on R&M on Recently Acquired Assets, understand your business and speak your language get in touch today.

 Call us: +64 9 269 5030
 Email: info@businesslike.co.nz